- BEM1083DA Project Manager Presentation Sample (Assessment 2) – University of Exeter
- BEM1083DA IKEA Case Study Report Sample (Assessment 1) – University of Exeter
- BUS3022 Social Responsibility in Practice Assignment Example 2026 | University of Northampton
- EFIM30040 The Digital Economy UOB Assignment Answer UK
- EFIM30051 Data Analytics and Artificial Intelligence for Business UOB Assignment Answer UK
- EFIM30047 Organizational Crime and Corruption UOB Assignment Answer UK
- EFIM30012 Corporate Social Responsibility and Sustainability UOB Assignment Answer UK
- EFIM20003 International Business Management Assignment Answer UK
- 07 37249 Business Communication Skills B Assignment Answer UK
- 07 37248 Business Communication Skills Assignment Answer UK
- 07 34272 Business Analytics Assignment Answer UK
- 07 32264 Responsible Business: Theory and Practice Assignment Answer UK
- 08 32101 Business, Economy and Government Assignment Answer UK
- 07 33171 Business Law Assignment Answer UK
- BGXC005 Business Design For The Digital World Assignment Sample UK
- BGXS003 Analytical Thinking For Problem Solving Assignment Sample UK
- B327 Creating Futures: Sustainable Enterprise And Innovation Assignment Sample UK
- BGXS002 The impact of storytelling in business Assignment Sample UK
- BU7412 International Business Assignment Sample UK
- BU5303 International Business Operations Assignment Sample UK
Entrepreneurship and Innovation MBA Business Plan and Reflective Essay Sample (ISTEC)
For information and reference only – not to be submitted as your own work.
This extract shows how a strong answer to the ISTEC MBA Entrepreneurship and Innovation 2026 business plan and reflective essay brief can be structured. The venture, figures and reflections are invented for illustration. For a step-by-step planning guide, read our guide to planning the MBA business plan and reflective essay.
Planning table
| Section | Marks | Suggested words | What the marker looks for |
|---|---|---|---|
| Part A: Business plan (eight themes) | 75 | 2,500–3,000 | Critical, analytical and evaluative use of theory applied to one venture |
| Executive summary and entrepreneurial thinking | Within Part A | 350 | A clear venture concept and a justified entrepreneurial approach |
| Opportunity spotting, evaluation and market research | Within Part A | 750 | Evidence-led screening of the idea, not description |
| Innovation, strategy and business model | Within Part A | 800 | Models used and critiqued, with a defensible value proposition |
| Financial awareness and exit strategy | Within Part A | 700 | Realistic assumptions, sensitivity and a reasoned exit route |
| Part B: Reflective essay | 15 | 1,000 (±10%) | One or two techniques, with evidence that they work |
The brief excludes references from the word count and requires APA 7th edition citations. The extract below condenses each theme to show the depth and tone expected.
Part A: Business plan extract
1. Executive summary and entrepreneurial thinking
The illustrative venture, GreenCrate Gulf, is a subscription service that delivers reusable packaging to small food retailers in the United Arab Emirates and collects it for cleaning and re-use. The founders treat the venture as a set of testable hypotheses rather than a fixed plan. This follows the view that entrepreneurship concerns the discovery, evaluation and exploitation of opportunities (Shane & Venkataraman, 2000). It also draws on effectuation, in which founders start with the means they already hold, such as supplier contacts and logistics knowledge, and shape goals as partners commit (Sarasvathy, 2001).
A critical point belongs here. Effectuation suits early uncertainty, but it can slow investment decisions once capital is needed. The plan therefore uses effectuation for the pilot stage and a more predictive, causal approach when scaling.
2. Opportunity spotting and evaluation
The opportunity arises from two observable shifts: growing pressure on retailers to cut single-use packaging, and the high cost of small-batch reusable systems. A strong answer does not stop at the idea. It screens the opportunity against explicit criteria, as the table below shows.
| Criterion | Score | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|
| Customer need | 4 | Retailers report packaging cost and compliance pressure in pilot interviews |
| Market size reachable in year one | 3 | Limited to two emirates; scalable only with a depot network |
| Competitive intensity | 3 | Few direct rivals, but many low-cost disposable suppliers |
| Founder fit | 4 | Logistics experience offsets limited marketing skills |
| Capital requirement | 2 | Depot and washing equipment require significant early funding |
The lowest score, capital requirement, shapes the later strategy: the plan proposes a shared-depot pilot instead of a purpose-built facility. This is the kind of link between analysis and decision that markers reward.
3. Industry and market research
Industry analysis uses Porter’s five forces (Porter, 2008). Supplier power is moderate because washing equipment and crate manufacturers are few. Buyer power is high because retailers can revert to disposables at low switching cost. The threat of substitutes is the dominant force. The limitation of the model is also stated: it assumes a stable industry boundary, which is questionable for a circular-economy service that blends logistics and packaging.
Primary research is described honestly. The plan proposes 15 short interviews and a retailer survey, and states its sampling limits rather than presenting the results as representative.
4. Innovation management
The innovation is a service-model innovation, not a technology breakthrough. The plan distinguishes sustaining from disruptive innovation (Christensen, 1997) and argues that GreenCrate Gulf is closer to a sustaining improvement for existing retailers, with disruptive potential only if it unlocks very small outlets that currently ignore reusable systems. It also sets out a stage-gate routine: each new service feature passes a customer test before further spend.
5. Strategy and business model
The business model is mapped using the Business Model Canvas (Osterwalder & Pigneur, 2010). The value proposition is lower per-use packaging cost, regulatory comfort and a sustainability story the retailer can show customers. Revenue comes from a monthly subscription plus a per-crate replacement fee.
The plan then applies lean experimentation (Ries, 2011; Blank, 2013). The riskiest assumption, that retailers will return crates reliably, is tested first through a four-week pilot with a small number of outlets. A criticism is acknowledged: lean methods work well for software but are harder to apply where physical assets create sunk costs. The plan answers this by renting equipment during the pilot.
Buy Non Plagiarized & Properly Structured Assignment Solution
6. Financial awareness
The financial section avoids spurious precision. It states assumptions, shows break-even logic and tests sensitivity.
| Item | Illustrative assumption | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| Monthly subscription per outlet | AED 400 (illustrative figure) | Priced below the retailer’s current disposable spend |
| Variable cost per outlet per month | AED 220 (illustrative figure) | Washing, transport and crate losses |
| Fixed monthly cost | AED 36,000 (illustrative figure) | Rented depot space, staff and insurance |
| Break-even outlets | 200 (calculated: 36,000 ÷ 180) | Sensitive to the crate loss rate |
The plan then flags the main sensitivity: if crate losses double, variable cost rises and break-even moves materially higher, which is why the pilot measures return rates before any larger commitment. Funding options such as founder capital, a small loan and an angel investor are compared on control, cost and speed.
7. Exit strategy
Three routes are weighed: trade sale to a logistics or packaging group, sale to a larger regional operator, or a founder buy-out funded from cash flow. A trade sale is preferred because a national depot network is a hard asset for acquirers, but the plan notes that this route depends on reaching scale in at least three emirates. The exit is linked to the milestones in the plan so that it reads as a decision, not an afterthought.
Part B: Reflective essay extract (about 1,000 words in full)
The essay focuses on one technique for developing an entrepreneurial mindset: structured customer discovery, in which I regularly spoke to potential users before building anything. I chose this technique because my first instinct in work projects had been to design the solution first and test it later.
The evidence for the technique comes from both practice and theory. In a recent workplace project, I interviewed six internal users before drafting a new reporting process. Two of them described a problem I had not considered, which changed the design before any time was wasted. This matches the argument that entrepreneurial learning depends on testing assumptions early (Blank, 2013). It also supports the view that opportunity recognition improves when individuals widen their search for information (Shane & Venkataraman, 2000).
Using Gibbs’ reflective cycle (Gibbs, 1988), I describe what happened, how I felt, what worked, what did not, and what I will change. The honest weakness is that six interviews are a small sample, and I tended to talk to people I already knew. My action plan is to recruit interviewees outside my immediate team and to record disconfirming evidence as carefully as supportive comments.
A second technique, intrapreneurial awareness, means looking for improvement opportunities inside an organisation rather than only starting new ventures (Pinchot, 1985). I link the two techniques: discovery generates insight, and intrapreneurial awareness gives that insight a route to action inside the employer.
How this extract earns marks
- Every theory is applied to the venture and then criticised.
- Assumptions and figures are labelled, and sensitivity is discussed.
- The reflective essay stays within one or two techniques and uses evidence of impact.
- All citations follow APA 7th edition and every source is in the reference list.
If you need specialist help structuring a plan like this, see our business development assignment help or our wider business management assignment help.
Please Write Fresh Non Plagiarized Assignment on this Topic
References
Blank, S. (2013). Why the lean start-up changes everything. Harvard Business Review, 91(5), 63–72.
Christensen, C. M. (1997). The innovator’s dilemma: When new technologies cause great firms to fail. Harvard Business School Press.
Gibbs, G. (1988). Learning by doing: A guide to teaching and learning methods. Further Education Unit.
Osterwalder, A., & Pigneur, Y. (2010). Business model generation: A handbook for visionaries, game changers, and challengers. John Wiley & Sons.
Pinchot, G., III. (1985). Intrapreneuring: Why you don’t have to leave the corporation to become an entrepreneur. Harper & Row.
Porter, M. E. (2008). The five competitive forces that shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 86(1), 78–93.
Ries, E. (2011). The lean startup: How today’s entrepreneurs use continuous innovation to create radically successful businesses. Crown Business.
Sarasvathy, S. D. (2001). Causation and effectuation: Toward a theoretical shift from economic inevitability to entrepreneurial contingency. Academy of Management Review, 26(2), 243–263.
Shane, S., & Venkataraman, S. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 217–226.
UPTO 35% DISCOUNT



