- OTHM Level 4 Unit Managing Digital Information (J/650/3386) Assignment Brief 2026
- OTHM Level 4 Unit Computer and Network Technology (L/617/2268) Assignment Brief 2026
- OTHM Level 4 Unit Web and Mobile Applications (H/650/3385) Assignment Brief 2026
- OTHM Level 4 Unit Systems Analysis and Design (F/617/2266) Assignment Brief 2026
- OTHM Level 4 Unit Principles of Computer Programming (F/650/3384) Assignment Brief
- OTHM Level 4 Unit Cyber Security (D/650/3383) Assignment Brief 2026
- BSC072 Strategic Information Management Coursework Brief 2026 | Loughborough University
- Financial Econometrics Assessed Coursework 1 2026 | University of Portsmouth
- UHRINN304 Medicines Management Summative Assessment 2026 | University of Suffolk
- CIPD Level 7 Unit 7OS06 Wellbeing at Work Assignment Example 2026
- CIPD Level 7 Unit 7OS05 Managing People in an International Context Assignment Example 2026
- CIPD Level 7 Unit 7OS04 Advanced Equality, Diversity and Inclusion Assignment Example 2026
- 7FNCE037W Global Entrepreneurial Finance Assessment Briefing 2026 | UOW
- CIPD Level 7 Unit 7OS03 Technology Enhanced Learning Assignment Example 2026
- BSC006 Financial Trading Assessment Coursework Brief 2026 | Loughborough University
- CIPD Level 7 Unit 7OS01 Advanced Employment Law in Practice Assignment Example 2026
- CIPD Level 7 Unit 7LD03 Designing Learning to Improve Performance Assignment Example 2026
- CIPD Level 7 Unit 7LD02 Leadership and Management Development in Context Assignment Example 2026
- BUS6012 Governance, Law and Ethics Assessment Brief 2026 | Arden University
- CIPD Level 7 Unit 7LD01 Organisational Design and Development Assignment Example 2026
MS70122E Data Science Insights for Decision Making Assignment 2 2026
| University | University of the West of London( UWL) |
| Subject | MS70122E Data Science Insights for Decision Making |
Preparing for your MS70122E Assessment
A key part of your learning will be preparation for your summative assessment. You will be provided feedback on your formative assessments, and this will help you to better understand what is required of you when you submit your summative assessment. Please see below guidance on your formative assessment and how to access your feedback.
Formative assessments will take place during the lecture and seminar sessions, covering the topics outlined in the table below. Feedback to guide your preparation for the summative assessment will be provided individually during these sessions.
Assessment Support
| Assessment (insert below type of assessment as per the table above) | Teaching Weeks in which Assessment Support Takes Place (enter each week no. in a new row) | Outline of Type and Form of Assessment Support to be Provided | Student Preparation Required Prior to or After the Support Session | How will the Support Session to be Delivered |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A2 Individual presentation | Week 11 | Individual Report Revision and assignment guidance will be provided. | Attend seminars and participate in classroom discussions. | During Seminars |
| A2 Individual presentation | Week 13 | Individual Report Revision and assignment guidance will be provided. | Attend seminars and participate in classroom discussions. | During Seminars |
đź’ˇ Struggling with your MS70122E Assignment 2 individual presentation?
Summative Assessment 2
| Assessment title | A2: Individual Forward- Looking Presentation |
| Submission date and time | Week 14, Friday 16 January 2026, 23:59 (Slides must be uploaded by 23:59 before the deadline day) |
| Word Count (or equivalent) | 8 minutes |
| Where to submit | Turnitin |
| Feedback date | 15 working days after the assessment date |
| Assessment Weighting | 50% |
| PSRB requirements (if applicable) | N/A |
Main objectives of the Assessment Individual Analysis (100%)
In Week 14, you are tasked with creating a video presentation on the company you selected in Assignment 1. This presentation must move beyond reviewing past strategic decisions and instead provide forward-looking recommendations on how the organisation can enhance its decision-making and risk management over the next 3–5 years.
Strong emphasis should be placed on critical thinking, originality, and thorough secondary research. Any AI tools must only be used within the limits of the Amber guidance under CELT’s Traffic Light System, serving to complement rather than replace your own analysis. All use of AI must be transparently acknowledged.
MS70122E Assessment Criteria
Introduction (15%)
- Apply risk management analysis to relate to the decision-making of the organisation in Assignment 1.
- Explain the importance of risk analysis and its current impact on the chosen organisation.
- Position the organisation for forward-looking evaluation by briefly noting its current decision- making context.
- Adhere to the Harvard referencing style.
Planning/Strategy (25%)
- Use of data, information, and secondary research to evaluate decision-making.
- Assessment of risk planning frameworks and benchmarking practices.
- Develop forward-looking strategic recommendations for integrated decision-making and risk management over the next 3–5 years.
- Adhere to the Harvard referencing style.
Issues and Challenges (30%)
- Identify and critically analyse issues faced by the organisation (operational, financial, market-related).
- Conduct risk/impact analysis of these issues.
- Consider how emerging risks (technological, regulatory, environmental) may affect future decision-making capacity.
- Adhere to the Harvard referencing style.
Conclusion (15%)
- Restate the main theme of your presentation.
- Summarise three forward-looking recommendations to strengthen the organisation’s risk management and decision-making.
- Adhere to the Harvard referencing style.
Presentation (15%)
- Communicate findings effectively and succinctly for a non-technical audience.
- Demonstrate a professional standard of presentation design and delivery.
- Maintain coherence and clarity in argument and visual aids.
- Show ability to handle potential questions with confidence.
- Adhere to the Harvard referencing style.
On the first slide, you must state:
- Name of the chosen Organisation
- Student Name
đź’ˇ Want human-written, AI-safe MS70122E presentation support?
Employability Skills
This assessment covers the following employability skills, which you could demonstrate on your CV and at job interviews if you successfully pass the assessment:
- Written Communication
- Problem solving
- Take initiative and self-motivating
- Critical thinking
- Can work under pressure and to deadline
- Planning and organisation skills
- Team working
- Ability to learn and adapt
- Numeracy
- Digitally literate
- Creativity/lateral thinking
- Time management
- Intellectual curiosity
- Perseverance
- Confidence
- Integrity and accountability
- Decision making
MS70122E Assessment 2 Marking Scheme
| Criteria | Distinction (70% +) | Merit (60–69%) | Pass (50–59%) | Fail (0–49%) |
| Introduction (Max 15 marks) | Excellent framing of the organisation in DSIDM context. Comprehensive explanation of current risk management context and decision-making challenges. Organisation aims and objectives clearly identified and linked to future strategy. | Very good framing of organisation in DSIDM context but less comprehensive coverage of risk management context. Aims and objectives identified but lacking clarity. | Adequate introduction with some relevant DSIDM terms. Limited discussion of risk management; focus more descriptive. Aims and objectives missing or inappropriate. | Weak or superficial introduction. Little or no recognition of risk management context. Aims and objectives absent. |
| Planning / Strategy (Max 25 marks) | Excellent use of data, secondary research, and frameworks. Critical evaluation of current risk planning and integration of forward-looking recommendations (3–5 years). Benchmarking justified and applied. | Good use of data and research. Risk planning addressed with some forward- looking recommendations but not fully integrated. Benchmarking is relevant but uneven. | Adequate use of data and frameworks. Risk planning discussed but superficial; forward-looking aspects vague. Benchmarking minimal. | Very limited use of data or frameworks. No meaningful discussion of risk planning or forward-looking recommendations. Benchmarking absent. |
| Issues and Challenges (Max 30 marks) | Rigorous analysis of operational, financial, and market issues. Comprehensive coverage of present and emerging risks (technological, | Good analysis of current issues. Emerging risks are only partially addressed. Evaluation shows insight but less consistent. | Adequate identification of issues. Risk/impact analysis limited; future risks are weakly developed. Some useful but shallow insights. | Superficial or descriptive analysis. No meaningful risk/impact analysis or outlook. |
đź’ˇ Short on time before your MS70122E assignment 2 submission deadline?
The MS70122E Data Science Insights for Decision Making Assignment 2 requires strong forward-looking analysis, especially when linking risk management with future decision-making strategies. Many students struggle to present clear, original insights within an 8-minute presentation while strictly following AI-usage and Harvard referencing rules. At Students Assignment Help, we provide human-written, AI-safe academic support tailored to individual presentations and strategic analysis. Get expert guidance from data science assignment writing service professionals who understand DSIDM frameworks and future risk planning. Explore MS70122E Data Science Insights for Decision Making Assignment 1Â for any need.
Answer
