- OTHM Level 5 K/650/1117 – Promoting Equality, Diversity, and Inclusion in Health and Social Care, Assignment, ILC, UK
- 7CO01: Critically evaluate underpinning theory and practice in this area and make recommendations for your organisation: Work and working lives in a changing business environment, Assignment, CIPD level 7, UK
- 7CO01: Evaluate the current trend for organisations to move from a five-day to a four-day working week without reducing their employees: Work and working lives in a changing business environment, Assignment, CIPD level 7, UK
- 7CO01: Critically discuss the current state of the major labour markets in which your organisation competes for staff in terms of both demand for and supply of skills: Work and working lives in a changing business environment, Assignment, CIPD level 7, UK
- 7CO01: Critically evaluate whether advancing technologies, and particularly artificial intelligence (AI): Work and working lives in a changing business environment, Assignment, CIPD level 7, UK
- Unit DAC4A1: Lead communication in adult care settings, Assignment, UOB, UK
- Unit HSC301: Role of the inter- professional team in delivering Health and Social care: An introduction to Health and Social Care, Assignment, UK
- Unit HSC301: The importance of regulatory bodies in delivery of high quality care: An introduction to Health and Social Care, Assignment, UK
- Unit HSC301: The main roles and responsibilities of Health and Social care workers when delivering care: An introduction to Health and Social Care, Assignment, UK
- Unit 04: Use an appropriate design tool to design a relational database system for a substantial problem: Database Design & Development, Assignment, BTEC Level 5, UK
- Unit 04: Centralized Database for MadZoo Digital-MadZoo Digital is a start-up company which was established in 2020: Database Design & Development, Assignment, BTEC Level 5, UK
- 5HR02: This unit focuses on the importance of effective workforce planning: Talent management and workforce planning, Assignment, CIPD, UK
- BMG847: Demonstrate a critical understanding of different research strategies and approaches: MSc International Business, Assignment, UU, UK
- Explain how the boundary layer thickness is defined- Give the definition of the friction coefficient: Thermofluids, Assignment, UOS, UK
- A thin-walled cylindrical pressure vessel with a diameter, D = 8 m, and an operational pressure 5 MPa made from a steel: Thermofluids, Assignment, UOS, UK
- Explain the physical importance and give the mathematical definition: Thermofluids, Assignment, UOS, UK
- 7HR01: Critically evaluating how this influences the work of its people professionals: Strategic employment relations, Assignment, CIPD, UK
- CIPD Level 3 3CO03: Ethical practice review A key responsibility for all ‘professionals’ is to regularly review and develop our performance at work: Core behaviours for people professionals, Assignment, UK
- CIPD Level 3: 3C002- Explain what evidence-based practice is and how it might be applied within an organisation: Principles of Analytics, Assignment , UK
- NVQ Unit 13 – Explain what it means to have a duty of care in your role and how it relates to duty of candour: The principles of Duty of Care, Assignment UK
Discuss The Role That Ethical Decision-Making Plays In Planning For The Future: Ethical Leadership Assignment, HWU, UK
University | Heriot-Watt University (HWU) |
Subject | Ethical Leadership |
Learning Objectives
By the end of the lesson, you should be able to:
- Discuss the role that ethical decision-making plays in planning for the future.
- Explore the implications of considering future generations as part of the individual/group
- Illustrate how a systematic approach to futures planning can better prepare an organization for its future.
Content
The Individual-Group Tug of War
Now that we have looked at a number of different ethical dilemmas related to people and organizations, we know that the conflict between individual autonomy and group interests is a recurring pattern in these dilemmas. It is unlikely, and probably not very desirable anyway, that any economy will ever commit totally to protecting either individual interests or group interests, to the exclusion of the other.
At one extreme, we would remove the purpose of an economy—to enable people in a group to get what they want. At the other extreme, we would remove most of the motivations to work. What we may be able to hope for, however, is an ethical manner of maintaining them in tandem. Nonetheless, when choices must be made between mutually exclusive alternatives, it is inevitable that one will have to be sacrificed to the other. To what extent can we acknowledge these mutually exclusive choices in strategic planning, and perhaps mitigate their effects insofar as they precipitate ethical dilemmas for decision-makers?
Do You Need Assignment of This Question
In this respect, individual organizations and the people within them may well follow the course that the United States as a nation (in the person of its government) has adopted in balancing the demands of group security with the preservation of individual freedoms. This balancing act has created a long series of decisions that are never entirely satisfying for either purpose from a utilitarian perspective, and that bend the categorical imperatives involved without breaking them.
Such a dialectic, which moves back and forth between the two priorities, is likely to characterize management practice as well. Surely, that is the way professionals and organizations engaged in economic activity are managing the conflict now, making the best possible decisions they can under the circumstances.
Ethical Challenges to Strategic Planning
The problem with occupying the middle ground as a permanent strategy is that, sooner or later, the logical contradiction between the two alternatives forces a choice. One alternative in a dilemma is always “to do nothing.” This may mean trying to hold onto the middle ground. As the situation grows more urgent, however, the space between a rock and a hard place shrinks to the point where there is no room for us to stand. In addition, as we have seen in most cases, “doing nothing” amounts to making a passive choice in favor of one of the alternatives for action anyway. The issue facing organizational leaders and those who manage the organization at a practical level is whether or not they choose to take responsibility for those choices, rather than “letting them happen.”
One of the forces creating pressure to eliminate the middle ground is the pace of science and technology. New possibilities that emerge from research and development nearly always raise the question, “Just because we can, does that mean we should?” The lag between having the means in hand and realizing the full implications of using it arises, in particular, when research and development are undertaken with a commercial interest in mind. When knowledge becomes intellectual property, issues of self-interest and social responsibility come immediately to the foreground. They call for answers to questions about which one is the higher priority.
Buy Answer of This Assessment & Raise Your Grades
How many times you have searched for assignment answers? You have searched a lot but not getting the relevant answers? No, worries we provide the Ethical Leadership assignment help. You can also pay for thesis writing UK our experts always pay attention to plagiarism policy, and give assurance to deliver your work within the deadline.