- Geotechnical Engineering Assignment 2025/26 – University Of Surrey (UniS)
- Essentials of Adult Nursing Summative Assessment – University of Roehampton London (UoRL)
- BMP3006 Practical Digital Marketing Assessment 1 Individual Written Portfolio September 2025 – Regent College London
- CIPD_5HR03_24_01 5HR03 Reward for Performance and Contribution Level 5 Associate Diploma Learner Assessment Brief – Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development
- AF6010/LD6041 Strategic Management Accounting Assessment Brief AY2026 – Northumbria University Newcastle (NUN)
- AB1 Lead Practice to Support Safeguarding of CYP & Harm & Abuse NVQ Level 5 Diploma Unit 4 and Unit 8 Activity Assignment Brief, Cambridge Management and Leadership School (CMLS)
- BTEC Unit 4: Leadership and Management Assignment Brief 1 2025-26, City of London College
- Culinary Arts Management (chef) Assignment Social Science Research Proposal , University College Birmingham (UCB)
- Unit 4002 Engineering Mathematics (A/651/0708) Assignment Brief 2025-2026, Barnsley College (BC)
- Nutrient Diploma Course Assessment 2025-26, The College of Naturopathic Medicine
- Unit 3 Management of Human Resources Pearson BTEC Diploma Assignment Brief 2025-2026 – Lyceum Campus UK
- NAM4034 Fundamental skills for Nursing Written Care Plan CW1 Assignment Brief Academic Year 2025-26, Buckinghamshire New University (BNU)
- Unit 5006 Further Mathematics – Pearson BTEC Level 5 Diploma Assignment 2025-2026, Leeds City College
- BIT4213 Fundamental of Cryptography Individual Assignment 1 – Understanding Cryptographic Techniques
- WNI077 Nutrition and Digestion Graded Assignment 2 Brief : Access to HE Diploma – Health and Social Care
- FDY3003 Exploring the Social World Assignment Essay – Arden University UK
- Mechanical Engineering Assessment: Design and Development of an Aerodynamics Package
- 7CO04 Business Research in People Practice Learner Assessment Brief
- Fundamentals of Chemistry Assignment Brief Workbook Task 1 and Task 2
- Managing Information System Assignment – A Case Study on Amazon
5IT05 Network Routing and Switching – 603/4791/0 Qualifi Level 5 Diploma in Information Technology
| University | City of London College |
| Subject | 5IT05: Network Routing and Switching |
QUALIFI ASSESSMENT DOCUMENT
| Qualification | Qualifi Level 5 Diploma in Information Technology |
| Qualification No (RQF) Unit Name Unit Reference No of Credits | 603/4791/0 |
| Network Routing and Switching | |
| 5IT05 | |
| 20 Credits |
Introduction
Prior to attempting this coursework assignment, learners must familiarise themselves with the following policies:
- Centre Specification
- Qualifi Quality Assurance Standards
- Qualifi Quality Policy Statement
Plagiarism and Collusion
In submitting the assignment Learner’s must complete a statement of authenticity confirming that the work submitted for all tasks is their own. The statement should also include the word count.
Your accredited study centre will direct you to the appropriate software that checks the level of similarity. Qualifi recommends the use of https://www.turnitin.com as a part of the assessment.
Plagiarism and collusion are treated very seriously. Plagiarism involves presenting work, excerpts, ideas or passages of another author without appropriate referencing and attribution.
Collusion occurs when two or more learners submit work which is so alike in ideas, content, wording and/or structure that the similarity goes beyond what might have been mere coincidence
Please familiarise yourself on Qualifi’s Malpractice and Maladministration policy, where you can find further information
Referencing
A professional approach to work is expected from all learners. Learners must therefore identify and acknowledge ALL sources/methodologies/applications used.
The learner must use an appropriate referencing system to achieve this. Marks are not awarded for the use of English; however, the learner must express ideas clearly and ensure that appropriate terminology is used to convey accuracy in meaning.
Qualifi recommends using Harvard Style of Referencing throughout your work.
Appendices
You may include appendices to support your work, however appendices must only contain additional supporting information, and must be clearly referenced in your assignment.
You may also include tables, graphs, diagrams, Gantt chart and flowcharts that support the main report should be incorporated into the back of the assignment report that is submitted.
Any published secondary information such as annual reports and company literature, should be referenced in the main text of the assignment, in accordance of Harvard Style Referencing, and referenced at the end of the assignment.
Confidentiality
Where a Learner is using organisational information that deals with sensitive material or issues, they must seek the advice and permission from that organisation about its inclusion.
Where confidentiality is an issue, Learners are advised to anonymise their assignment report so that it cannot be attributed to that particular organisation.
Word Count Policy
Learners must comply with the required word count, within a margin of +10%. These rules exclude the index, headings, tables, images, footnotes, appendices and information contained within references and bibliographies.
When an assessment task requires learners to produce presentation slides with supporting notes, the word count applies to the supporting notes only.
Submission of Assignments
All work to be submitted on the due date as per Centre’s advice.
All work must be submitted in a single electronic document (.doc file), or via Turnitin, where applicable.
This should go to the tutor and Centre Manager/Programme Director, plus one hard copy posted to the Centre Manager (if required)
Marking and grades
Qualifi uses a standard marking rubric for all assignments, and you can find the details at the end of this document. Unless stated elsewhere, Learners must answer all questions in this document.
Do You Need Assignment of This Question
Assignment Question
Task 1 – 1000 words Understand switching
1.1: Describe what is packet switching and circuit switching and differentiate their functionality under following aspects (1.2, 1.4)
Forward transmission
Bandwidth wastage and reservation Physical path
Data packet transmission
1.2: Describe the following features in managed switches (1.3) Quality of Service (QoS)
Simple Network Management Protocol Virtual Local Area Networks Redundancy
Port Mirroring
1.3: What are the factors you need to consider before you select a switch for an office network? (1.1)
Assessment Criteria
- Evaluate the considerations to be taken into account in the purchase of a switch
- Analyse switching techniques and protocols
- Analyse the features in managed switches
- Analyse the differences between circuit switching and packet switching
Task 2 – 1000 words
Perform routing
- : Describe the uses, advantages and disadvantages of static routing (2.1)
- : What is inter VLAN routing and describe 3 ways it can be configured (2.1)
- : Describe Static routing and Dynamic routing along with their advantages and What are Distance vector (RIP, IGRP) and Link state (OSPF, IS-IS) protocols (2.2, 2.3)
2.4: Draw simple illustration examples for Single are multi area OSPF (Open Shortest Path First) protocols. Describe how you enable OSPF instance, configure OSPF area, configure OSPF network in single area OSPF. Describe how you create an area and attach OSPF networks to the area in multi area OSPF (2.4, 2.5, 2.6)
2.5: Describe how you configure EIGRP (Enhanced Interior Gateway Routing) for IPv4 (2.7)
Assessment Criteria
- Evaluate the considerations to be taken into account in making static and inter-VLAN routing decisions
- Analyse routing techniques and protocols
- Evaluate the considerations to be taken into account in dynamic routing
- Evaluate the considerations to be taken into account in a single and multi-area OSPF
- Set up and configure a single area OSPF to agreed standards
- Configure a multi area OSPF to agreed standards
- Configure a multi area EIGRP to agreed standards
Distinguished Excellent Good Proficient Basic Marginal Unacceptable
| Criteria | 80+ | 70 | 60 | 50 | 40 | 30 | 0 |
| Comprehensive | Adequate | Describes some of | |||||
| Content (alignment with assessment criteria) | Extensive evaluation and synthesis of ideas; includes substantial original thinking | critical evaluation and synthesis of ideas; includes coherent original thinking | evaluation and synthesis of key ideas beyond basic descriptions; includes original thinking | Describes main ideas with evidence of evaluation; includes some original thinking | the main ideas but omits some concepts; limited evidence of evaluation; confused original thinking | Largely incomplete description of main issues; misses key concepts; no original thinking | Inadequate information or containing information not relevant to the topic |
| In-depth, detailed | Clear and relevant | Appropriate | Adequate | Confused | |||
| Application of Theory and Literature | and relevant application of theory; expertly integrates literature to support ideas and concept | application of theory; fully integrates literature to support ideas and concepts | application of theory; integrates literature to support ideas and concepts | application of theory; uses literature to support ideas and concepts | Limited application of theory; refers to literature but may not use it consistently | application of theory; does not use literature for support | Little or no evidence of application of theory and relevant literature |
| Comprehensive | Sound | Basic Knowledge | Limited and | Confused or | |||
| Knowledge and Understanding | Extensive depth of understanding and exploration beyond key principles and concepts | knowledge and depth of understanding key principles and concepts | understanding of principles and concepts | and understanding of key concepts and principles | superficial knowledge and understanding of key concepts and principles | inadequate knowledge and understanding of key concepts and principles | Little or no evidence of knowledge or understanding of key concepts and principles |
| Logical, coherent | Somewhat weak presentation; errors in mechanics and syntax may interfere with meaning | ||||||
| and polished | Logical, coherent | Logical structure to | Confused | Illogical | |||
| presentation | presentation | presentation; makes | Orderly | presentation; errors | presentation lacking | ||
| Presentation and | exceeding | demonstrating | few errors in | presentation; minor | in mechanics and | cohesion; contains | |
| Writing Skills | expectations at this | mastery; free from | mechanics and | errors in mechanics | syntax often | significant errors | |
| level; free from | errors in mechanics | syntax which do not | and syntax | interfere with | that interfere with | ||
| errors in mechanics | and syntax | prohibit meaning | meaning | meaning | |||
| and syntax | |||||||
| Referencing | Advanced use of in- text citation and references | Mastery of in-text citation and referencing | Appropriate use of in-text citation and referencing | Adequate use of in- text citation and referencing | Limited use of in- text citation and referencing | Inadequate use of citation and referencing | Little or no evidence of appropriate referencing or use of source |
Directions:
- For each of the criteria listed in the first column, circle one box in the corresponding column to the right which best reflects the student’s work on this particular assessment activity (e.g., project, presentation, essay).
- Provide specific feedback to a student about each of the criteria scores he/she earned by writing comments and suggestions for improvement in the last row titled “Instructor’s comments.”
- To arrive at a mark, total the boxes and divide by 5 to arrive at final
Example:
| Distinguished | Excellent | Good | Proficient | Basic | Marginal | Unacceptable | |
| Range | 80-100 | 70-79 | 60-69 | 50-59 | 40-49 | 35-39 | 0-34 |
| Criteria | Score |
| Content | 50 |
| Application of Theory and Literature | 40 |
| Knowledge and Understanding | 50 |
| Presentation/Writing Skills | 40 |
| Referencing | 40 |
| Total Score | 220/5 = 44, Basic |
Buy Answer of This Assessment & Raise Your Grades
Many IT students find routing and switching assignments complex due to advanced topics like OSPF, EIGRP, VLAN configuration, and QoS management. If you struggle with protocols, network topologies, or report formatting, expert support can help you meet Qualifi standards easily. At Students Assignment Help UK, our professionals provide AI-free, plagiarism-free information technology assignment help tailored to your university module. Explore our network routing and switching assignment help and qualifi assignment service for trusted academic support today.



