Qualifi Level 7 Unit 724 Development as a Strategic Manager Assignment Brief 2026

Subject	Unit 724 Development as a Strategic Manager

Qualifi Level 7 Unit 724 Assignment Brief

Qualification	Qualifi Level 7 Diploma in Strategic Management and Leadership
Unit Reference Code	J/506/9064
Unit Name	Development as a Strategic Manager
Qualification Reference (RQF)	601/5335/0
No of Credits	15 Credits

Introduction

Prior to attempting this coursework assignment, Learners must familiarise themselves with the following policies:

Qualifi Quality Assurance Standards
Qualifi Quality Policy Statement
Centre Specification Can be found at https://qualifi.net/qualifi-level-7-diploma-in-strategic-management-and-leadership/

The unit aims to supports organisational and self-awareness in Learners. It provides foundations for a self-critical and reflective approach to personal development to support the Learner when operating at a strategic level. Wider context organisation and environmental factors are also considered as contributors to overall strategic success of the individual and the organisation.

Assignment Guidelines

All work must be submitted in a single electronic document (.doc/.docx file). The assignment must be the Learner’s own work and not copies of theories or models. Direct quotes should be kept to a minimum and shown in inverted commas. Models described and other quotes used must be properly attributed and referenced as appropriate. Learners must acknowledge or reference any sources that have been used to complete the assignment, listing reference material and web sites used.

Plagiarism And Collusion

In submitting the assignment Learner’s must complete a statement of authenticity confirming that the work submitted for all tasks is their own. The statement should also include the word count. Plagiarism and collusion are treated very seriously. Plagiarism involves presenting work, excerpts, ideas or passages of another author without appropriate referencing and attribution. Collusion occurs when two or more learners submit work which is so alike in ideas, content, wording and/or structure that the similarity goes beyond what might have been mere coincidence.

Appendices

Separate Appendices should not be used. Any use of tables, graphs, diagrams, Gantt chart and flowcharts etc. that support the main report should be incorporated into the back of the assignment report that is submitted. Any published secondary information such as annual reports and company literature, should be referenced in the main text of the assignment but not included.

Confidentiality

Where a Learner is using organisational information that deals with sensitive material or issues, they must seek the advice and permission from that organisation about its inclusion. Where confidentiality is an issue, Learners are advised to anonymise their assignment report so that it cannot be attributed to that particular organisation.

Word Count Policy

Learners must comply with the required word count, within a margin of +10%.These rules exclude the index (if used), headings and information contained within references and bibliographies. When an assessment task requires learners to produce presentation slides with supporting notes, the word count applies to the supporting notes only.

Referencing

A professional approach to work is expected from all learners. Learners must therefore identify and acknowledge ALL sources/methodologies/applications used. The learner must use an appropriate referencing system to achieve this. Marks are not awarded for the use of English; however the learner must express ideas clearly and ensure that appropriate terminology is used to convey accuracy in meaning.

Submission Of Assignments

All work must be submitted in a single electronic document (.doc/.docx file) in your Learning Portal or to submit to the Assessor/Centre Administrator.

Marking And Grades

Qualifi uses a standard marking rubric for all assignments, and you can find the details at the end of this document. Unless stated elsewhere, Learners must answer all questions in this document.

Unit Title	Development as a Strategic Manager
Unit Reference (RQF)	J/506/9064
No of Credits	15 Credits

Struggling with Unit 724 Development as a Strategic Manager Assignment with Qualifi Level 7 Requirements?

Order Non Plagiarized Assignment

Learning Outcomes And Assessment Criteria

Learning Outcomes

When awarded credit for this unit, a learner will:

Assessment Criteria

Assessment of this learning outcome will require a learner to demonstrate that they can:

1. Be able to identify personal skills to achieve strategic ambitions

1.1 Critically analyse the strategic direction of the organisation

1.2 Critically evaluate the strategic skills required of the leader operating in a complex environment to achieve personal and organisational strategic ambitions

1.3 Assess the relationship between existing, required and future skills to achieve strategic ambitions

2. Be able to manage personal leadership development to support achievement of strategic ambitions

2.1 Critically discuss the opportunities to support leadership development

2.2 Design a personal development plan to direct leadership development in a complex environment

2.3 Devise an implementation process to underpin the success of the development plan that can realise substantial changes in leadership style

3. Be able to evaluate the effectiveness of the leadership development plan

3.1 Critically evaluate the achievement of outcomes of the plan against original objectives

3.2 Evaluate the impact of leadership style and the achievement of objectives on strategic ambitions in different organisational settings

3.3 Critically review and update the leadership development plan

Assignment Tasks

Learners may use their own employment context, or that of another organisation with which they are very familiar, as the basis for their assignment. However, in the case that they are not able to do so, please use the below scenario:

Scenario

You are a senior manager in a business unit of a medium sized enterprise, with functional management and organisational leadership responsibilities. You are responsible for all aspects of the performance management of your team and its contribution towards the achievement of business goals.

Task 1: Formative Task– Personal Skills and Strategic Ambitions

How far do your current skills enable you to help to achieve the strategic ambitions of your organisation? Your answer must include:

An outline of your various skills, and of the expectations of those skills as set out in the organisation’s strategic objectives (LO 1.1)
Identify and explain how far your skills meet, exceed or fall below the standards set by the organisation’s strategic objective (LO 1.2)
A discussion of how well the organisation promotes effective leadership development (LO 1.3)

Formatting

450-550 words
Justified alignment
Single-spaced
12pt Times New Roman font
Use an appropriate referencing system for footnotes and citations

Task 2: Summative- Leadership Development Plan

Undertake a review of your organisation’s leadership development plan. Your answer must include:

An outline of the current provision within the organisation for leadership development (LO 2.1, 3.1)
Identify and explain how far this provision meets or exceeds the needs of leaders in achieving the organisation’s strategic ambitions (LO 2.2, 3.2)
Make a series of recommendations for the improvement of the organisation’s leadership development in the pursuit of its strategic objectives (LO 2.3, 3.3)

Formatting

950-1100 words
Justified alignment
Single-spaced
12pt Times New Roman font
Use an appropriate referencing system for footnotes and citations

Unit 724 Assignment Mark Scheme

Criteria	Distinguished 80+	Excellent 70	Good 60	Proficient 50	Basic 40	Marginal 30	Unacceptable 0
Content (alignment with assessment criteria)	Extensive evaluation and synthesis of ideas; induces substantial original thinking	Comprehensive critical evaluation and synthesis of ideas; induces coherent original thinking	Adequate evaluation and synthesis of key ideas beyond basic description; includes original thinking	Describes main ideas with evidence of evaluation; includes some original thinking	Describes some of the main ideas but omits some concepts; limited evaluation; does not develop original thinking	Largely incomplete description of main issues; misses key concepts; no original thinking	Inadequate information or containing information not relevant to the topic
Application of Theory and Literature	In-depth, detailed and relevant application of theory; expertly integrates literature to support ideas	Clear and relevant application of theory; fully integrates literature to support ideas and concepts	Appropriate application of theory; integrates literature to support ideas and concepts	Adequate application of theory; uses literature to support ideas and concepts	Limited application of theory; refers to literature but may not use it consistently	Confused application of theory; does not use literature to support	Little or no evidence of application of theory and relevant literature
Knowledge and Understanding	Extensive depth of understanding and exploration beyond key principles and concepts	Comprehensive knowledge and depth of understanding of key principles and concepts	Sound understanding of principles and concepts	Basic knowledge and understanding of key concepts and principles	Limited and superficial knowledge and understanding of key concepts and principles	Confused or inadequate knowledge and understanding of key concepts and principles	Little or no evidence of knowledge or understanding of key concepts and principles
Presentation and Writing Skills	Logical, coherent and polished presentation exceeding expectations at this stage; free from errors in mechanics and syntax	Logical, coherent presentation demonstrating mastery; free from error in mechanics and syntax	Logical structure to presentation; makes few errors in mechanics and syntax which do not prohibit meaning	Orderly presentation; minor errors in mechanics and syntax	Somewhat weak presentation; errors in mechanics and syntax may interfere with meaning	Confused presentation; errors in mechanics and syntax often interfere with meaning	Illogical presentation lacking cohesion; contains significant errors that interfere with meaning
Referencing	Advanced use of in-text citation and references	Mastery of in-text citation and referencing	Appropriate use of in-text citation and referencing	Adequate use of in-text citation and referencing	Limited use of in-text citation and referencing	Inadequate use of citation and referencing	Little or no evidence of appropriate referencing or use of sources

Marking Directions

For each of the criteria listed in the first column, circle one box in the corresponding column to the right which best reflects the student’s work on this particular assessment activity (e.g., project, presentation, essay).
Provide specific feedback to a student about each of the criteria scores he/she earned by writing comments and suggestions for improvement in the last row titled “Instructor’s comments.”
To arrive at a mark, total the boxes and divide by 5 to arrive at a final mark

Example:

Criteria	Score
Content	70
Application of Theory and Literature	70
Knowledge and Understanding	60
Presentation/Writing Skills	80
Referencing	80
Total Score: (360 / 5)	72

Order Custom Qualifi Level 7 Unit 724 Assignment Help from UK Diploma Experts

Request to Buy Answer

Many Qualifi Level 7 students find the Unit 724 Development as a Strategic Manager assignment challenging because analysing organisational strategy, evaluating leadership competencies, and designing an effective leadership development plan require strong strategic thinking and reflective analysis skills. But there is no need to worry, as Students Assignment Help UK provides reliable strategic management assignment help aligned with Qualifi Level 7 Diploma requirements. You can also review our custom-written assignment examples for reassurance. Order today assignment help uk and receive a 100% custom, human-written Unit 724 assignment, prepared only for you.

Answer