- A6001C17 Advances in Animal Production Science Assignment Brief 2026 | HAU
- SOCI5270 Contemporary Sociological Theory Essay Assessment 2026 | UOK
- 4BE002 The Innovative Business Assignment Brief 2026 | University of Wolverhampton
- CIPD Level 5 5LD01 Support Informal and Self-Directed Learning Assessment Brief 2026
- COM4016 Productivity and Collaboration Tools for Learning and Work Assessment Brief 2026 | Arden University
- CA6060 Financial Decision-Making in Context for Aviation Assignment 2 Question 2026
- NCFE CACHE Level 3 Diploma for Working in the Early Years Sector Assessment Brief 2026
- CRN 63466 / CRN 63467 Statutory Valuation Level 7 Assessment Brief 2026 | USM
- BSM24105 Operations and Project Management Assessment Brief 2026 | RUL
- Professional Communication Assessment 1 Semester 2, 2026 | UGM
- LAW7128 Conflict Resolution in Business Assignment Brief 2026 | BCU
- MLA604 Maritime Operations Assessment Brief Jan 2026 | MLA College
- HS7008 Research Methods in Public Health Summative Assignment 2026 | UEL
- MAR020-1 Introduction to Digital Marketing and Analytics Assignment 1 Brief 2026 | UOB
- LCBB5014 Data Handling and Business Intelligence Assignment Brief 2026 | UOW
- 6BM040 Honours Research Project Assessment Brief 2026 | University of Wolverhampton
- A334 English Literature from Shakespeare to Austen Tutor-Marked Assignment 03, 2026 | OU
- ADV767 Advanced Clinical Reasoning in Musculoskeletal Conditions Assessment Brief 2026 | UOP
- IS2184 Information Systems Management Individual Assignment 2026 | UOL
- MK7050 Principles and Practices of International Business Assessment Brief 2026
BMS11100 Advanced Immunology Assessment Brief 2026 | ENU
| University | Edinburgh Napier University (ENU) |
| Subject | BMS11100 Advanced Immunology |
BMS11100 Assessment Brief
| 1. Module number | BMS11100 |
| 2. Module title | Advanced Immunology |
| 3. Module leader | Dr Graham Wright |
4. Tutor with responsibility for this Assessment Student’s first point of contact | Dr Graham Wright |
| 5. Assessment | Immunology Project – Short Communication |
| 6. Weighting | 40% module assessment (Component 2) |
| 7. Size and/or time limits for assessment | Please see Immunology project instructions below. |
| 8. Deadline of submission | Friday 12 noon of Week 13 (Trimester 1) There will be penalties for late submission; up to 1 week late, capped at P1, no marks thereafter (F-5). |
| 9. Arrangements for submission | You must submit an electronic copy of your work through the final Turnitin box on the Moodle site. You are advised to keep a copy of the assessment. |
| 10. Assessment Regulations | All assessments are subject to the University Regulations Please tell your tutor before the deadline if you have exceptional circumstances and require an extension. A request for an extension should be made using the coursework extension request form (CE1), Otherwise the usual penalties for late submission will apply |
| 11. The requirements for the assessment | Completion of the lab report addressing/following the points detailed in the mini-project instructions (see below). |
| 12. Special instructions | Please see the detailed Immunology project assessment instructions’ below’. If you have any questions, please ask your tutor preferably via the Moodle discussion board. |
| 13. Nature of Feedback | Written feedback will be available within 3 working weeks of submission of the Immunology project assessment. Please remember that written feedback may not be available until after the Christmas break. You should reflect upon the feedback received along with your coursework submission and the assessment criteria provided. It would be useful to bring assessment feedback from your assignments to your next PDT session |
| 14. Return of work | The Student Charter specifies an entitlement to written feedback for coursework within 3 weeks of submission. We will work hard to meet this deadline; however, please remember that Christmas break begins end of week 15 December and ends in the first week of January and therefore the written feedback may not be available until after the Christmas break. |
| 15. Assessment criteria | Refer to the detailed instructions below/attached for the Assessment criteria. Assessment criteria follow normal academic conventions for acknowledging sources. |
💡 Struggling with BMS11100 Advanced Immunology project?
BMS11100Assessment Instruction
You are required to write a short communication based on the work you carried out in the lab practical’s, following the instructions below. The document you generate will be assessed and marks allocated for each section as outlined below.
Note: Normally, an introduction and methodology would be required, but these will be provided for you in this assessment so you can focus on the presenting the work you did within the lab. Please read the supplied introduction and methodology carefully and refer back to it (including using the references) where appropriate.
Sections and Marks Breakdown
Hypothesis: No word limit [5 marks]
Clearly state the hypothesis you are testing, grounded in the project’s context: whether Trichuris trichiura excretory/secretory products (ESPs) can modulate macrophage activation in an in vitro model relevant to rheumatoid arthritis. Focus on the expected effect of ESPs on LPS-induced pro-inflammatory induction, specifically IL-8 production.
Results: Target word count: 300 words (excluding graphs and figure legends) [40 marks]
In the Results section, you should include a clear and concise written description of your findings from the experiment. This includes morphological observations of the THP-1 cells and the quantitative IL-8 data obtained from the ELISA. This section should focus on describing your data/observations, but this should be done providing context within the scope of your research question with clarity over what the experimental conditions/controls tell you. You should present two figures, each with an accompanying figure legend that provides sufficient context and detail to understand the data presented.
- Written Descriptions:
Provide a description of the cell morphology observations, highlighting any visible changes across the different treatment groups.
Summarize the key findings from the IL-8 ELISA data, focusing on the IL-8 levels across treatment conditions without interpreting these results.
- Figures and Legends:
Figure 1: Include representative images of THP-1 cells from each treatment condition (e.g., Control, PMA-treated, PMA + LPS-treated, and PMA + LPS + ESP-treated). Ensure that each image is labelled with the relevant treatment condition. The accompanying legend should briefly describe the experimental setup and note any significant morphological differences between conditions.
Figure 2: Present the IL-8 concentration data as a bar chart. Label the x-axis with the treatment groups (e.g., “Control,” “PMA only,” “PMA + LPS,” “PMA + LPS + ESP”) and the y-axis with “IL-8 concentration (pg/mL).” The figure legend should explain the experimental conditions, detail any statistical significance observed, and provide context for interpreting the IL-8 levels in relation to the treatment groups.
Note: There is no need to include the standard curve used for cytokine concentration calculation in the main results section. You may include it as an appendix if desired, but it will not be assessed.
Discussion: Target word count: 300 words [40 marks]
Interpretation of Results: Discuss the results obtained, explaining any observed trends or unexpected outcomes. Address the implications of the ESP’s effect on IL-8 levels in the context of modulating macrophage activity in rheumatoid arthritis.
Context with Current Literature: Compare your findings with existing literature on helminth ESPs and their immunomodulatory effects, specifically in autoimmune or inflammatory diseases. Reference at least 3-4 relevant studies (use APA-7 citation style). Consider discussing potential mechanisms by which T. trichiura ESPs might impact macrophage activation, particularly via pathways like NF-κB that influence cytokine production.
Conclusion
Target word count: 60 words [5 marks]
Summarise the main findings of your experiment in relation to the hypothesis. Clearly state your conclusion on whether the ESP demonstrated an anti- inflammatory effect by suppressing IL-8 production in the THP-1 macrophage- like model.
Reference List
[10 marks]
Compile a list of references in APA-7 format. Marks will be awarded based on the relevance and scope of the references, correct citation within the text, and proper formatting in the reference list.
Additional Notes
Clarity and Structure: Ensure that each section is well-organised and adheres to the word limits specified.
Data Presentation: Follow guidelines for presenting figures and label each axis and figure legend comprehensively.
Objectivity: In the Results section, focus on describing what the data shows rather than interpreting its significance. Save interpretation and broader context for the Discussion. (You should however, describe the results in the context of the research question and the experimental conditions – if unsure look for examples in published literature)
💡 Want a plagiarism-free BMS11100 Assignment Help?
Many students find BMS11100 Advanced Immunology projects challenging because they require concise scientific writing, accurate data presentation, and critical discussion aligned with current immunology literature. If you are struggling with structuring the Results section, writing a high-quality Discussion, or correctly presenting ELISA data and figures, expert support can reduce stress and improve your marks. At Students Assignment Help UK, we provide ENU assignment help that is plagiarism-free, AI-free, and fully aligned with assessment criteria. Our subject experts ensure clarity, APA-7 referencing accuracy, and strong linkage between hypothesis, results, and discussion. For reliable academic support in immunology, explore our online assignment writing services UK today.



