- H/618/5284 OTHM Level 3 Working Relationships and Partnership Assignment: Health & Social Care Case Study for Professional Roles and Quality Practice
- Fashion Product Management Assignment: TrendVogue Case Study for Sustainable Sourcing Compliance
- Aircraft Design Assignment Report: Mission-Based Design, Market Analysis & Performance Improvements
- Mechatronic System Design Assignment: Automated Manufacturing Case Study for Industry 4.0-Optimised Control
- Costing and Budgeting Assignment: BioTube Ltd. Case Study on VitaTube Pro Financial Planning
- Unit 26 Machine Learning Assignment: FreshFarms Case Study for Early Fruit Disease Detection Using Image Classification
- Unit 3 Toyota HRM Assignment 1: Talent Management Strategy to Improve Organisational Performance
- T/650/9628 BTEC level 4 Unit 1 Adjustable PCB Inspection Jig Design Assignment: Manufacturing Solution for Multi-Factory Use Case
- K/615/1475 BTEC Level 4 Engineering Design Project Assignment 1: Solar-Powered Automated Seedling Transplanter Report and Presentation
- BTEC Level 2 Unit 10 Database Development Assignment: Pet Sitting Hotel Case Study
- COM5021 Data Analytics and Visualisation Assignment: Abalone Case Study Using Excel for Statistical Insights
- OUBS035312 Machine Learning Assignment: Education Applications and Multi-Class Classification Using Supervised Algorithms with Kaggle Dataset
- BTEC Level 3 Unit 10 Accounting Transactions Assignment: Dunkin & McGregor, Crash Test Dummies & Yin & Yang Case Study for Financial Control and Error Rectification
- CSE5009-B Soil Mechanics Assignment: Geotechnical Lab & Fieldwork Report on Yorkshire Sites
- Aston Martin Governance Assignment: Case Study on 2024 Code Compliance & Board Diversity
- DTO Software Sales Assignment: TMA 01 Case Study on License Sales Trends & Business Insights
- QQI 6N2206 Person Centred Planning Assignment: 8 Reflective Journal Entries with Real-Life Practice & Video Case Study
- CME8131 Off-Grid Renewable Energy Assignment: Wind-Hydrogen Power Design for Remote Northern Europe
- BTEC Level 2 IT Systems Assignment: User Requirements, Evaluation Methods & Product Parameters
- QHO542 HCI Case Study Analysis Assignment: Solent University Design Report
AFM01MA Management Accounting Assignment 1: BioTube Ltd. Case Study for Costing, Budgeting & Variance Improvement
University | Canterbury Christ Church University (CCCU) |
Subject | AFM01MA Introduction to Management Accounting |
Module Assignment Brief
This assignment has been designed to provide you with an opportunity to demonstrate your achievement of the following module learning outcomes:
Module Outcome 1 | Demonstrate an understanding of the elements of costing. |
---|---|
Module Outcome 2 | Demonstrate the application of practical and theoretical classification of costs. |
Module Outcome 3 | To understand the importance of budgeting and cost management to improve business performance. |
Assignment Requirements
Overview
This case study involves BioTube Ltd., a company specialising in manufacturing high-quality blood testing tubes. The focus is on applying management accounting concepts to assess and improve BioTube Ltd.’s financial management, particularly in costing, budgeting, and variance analysis.
Assignment task/s to be completed
Assignment Title: Costing and Budgeting at BioTube Ltd.
As an Assistant Accountant of BioTube Ltd., you are required to submit a detailed report covering cost classifications, budget formulation, variance analysis, and recommendations for BioTube Ltd.’s financial management improvements. Please see below for the company’s background information and the suggested report format:
Company’s Background:
BioTube Ltd. is a manufacturing company specialising in producing high-quality blood testing tubes used in medical laboratories. The company is planning a new project to manufacture an advanced blood testing tube model named “VitaTube Pro.” Management needs a detailed budget for effective cost management and optimal resource allocation, emphasising costing, budgeting, and variance analysis.
Scenario:
BioTube Ltd. is preparing for the launch of VitaTube Pro. Using the provided data, demonstrate how BioTube prepares budgets and performs variance analysis using full costing. Additionally, explain activity-based costing (ABC) and discuss how it differs from full costing.
Do You Need Assignment of This Question
Case Study Data:
VitaTube Pro’s Budgeting and Costing Data:
- Material Costs:
- Glass Material: £8 per unit, estimated need: 2,000 units.
- Rubber Seal: £0.75 per unit, estimated need: 2,000 units.
- Additive Chemical: £2 per unit, estimated need: 1,800 units.
- Labour Costs:
- Machine Operator: £25 per hour, estimated hours: 500.
- Quality Control Inspector: £30 per hour, estimated hours: 200.
- Project Supervisor: £40 per hour, estimated hours: 150.
- Overhead Costs:
- Factory Rent: £6,000 per month.
- Utilities: £300 per month plus £0.50 per production hour (estimated production hours: 850).
- Machinery Depreciation: £3,000 per month.
- Administrative Expenses: £1,500 per month.
- Actual Costs (Post-Project Launch):
- Glass Material: £17,500.
- Rubber Seal: £1,700.
- Additive Chemical: £4,100.
- Machine Operator: £13,750.
- Quality Control Inspector: £6,600.
- Project Supervisor: £6,300.
- Factory Rent: £6,500 per month.
- Utilities: £1,000 per month.
- Machinery Depreciation: £3,500 per month.
- Administrative Expenses: £2,000 per month.
Report Structure
- Introduction to Management Accounting and Costing Systems: (400 words)
- What is management accounting? Describe its role in organisations and provide examples.
- What is the difference between management accounting and financial accounting?
- What is Full Costing? Describe its role in management accounting.
- What is activity-based (ABC) costing? Describe its importance in achieving precise cost allocation.
- Example: Provide examples of how full costing and ABC could be applied by BioTube Ltd. for VitaTube Pro.
- Cost Classification and Behaviour: (250 words)
- Define cost classification explaining the different types of costs (fixed, variable, and semi-variable) and how they behave in relation to changes in business activity levels.
- Example: Provide examples of each type of costs within the context of BioTube Ltd., such as rent, material costs, and utilities.
- Material, Labour, and Overhead Costs: (300 words)
- Material Costs
- Define material costs in the context of management accounting.
- Application at BioTube Ltd (Calculation):
Using the data provided, Calculate total material costs for Glass, Rubber Seal, and Additive Chemical.
- Labour Costs
- Describe labour costs in management accounting, including their classification in Management Accounting.
- Application at BioTube Ltd (Calculation):
Calculate total labour costs for Machine Operator, Quality Control Inspector, and Project Supervisor.
- Overhead Costs
- Define overhead costs in the context of management accounting and describe their allocation basis under full costing and ABC.
- Application at BioTube Ltd.
Using the data provided, suggest how BioTube Ltd. assigns overhead costs (utilities, depreciation, administrative expenses) to VitaTube Pro. Link these costs clearly to specific activities such as production processes, quality assurance, and administrative tasks.
- Material Costs
- Budgeting and Variances: (400 words)
- Define the budgeting process within the context of management accounting and discuss its influence on organisational performance, including the controls it impacts.
- Application at BioTube Ltd. (Calculation):
Using the provided data, prepare the budget for VitaTube Pro, clearly showing material, labour, and overhead costs in a structured table format. Additionally, conduct a variance analysis in table form to clearly illustrate discrepancies between budgeted and actual figures. Clearly identify and discuss possible reasons for any unfavourable variances. Highlight reasons for unfavourable variances.
- Conclusions and Recommendations: (150 words)
- Summary: Briefly summarise key insights gained from the costing analysis, budget creation, and variance analysis.
- Recommendations: Provide strategic recommendations based on the variance analysis findings to enhance BioTube Ltd.’s cost management and budgeting practices.
Additional Information required to support completing the tasks above
- Please include a table of contents and the report title in your report.
- Your report should include a minimum of 10 in-text citations. You are allowed to use one citation for more than once.
- Calculations are not included in the word count.
Mandatory Referencing and Research Requirements
Referencing Style CCCU Harvard Referencing Style.
Mandatory Sources to be included in the Assignment
- Cox, D. and Amos, S. (2022). Management Accounting Techniques: Tutorial: Support as you Learn. London: Osborne Books
- Weetman, P. (2019) Financial Accounting: . An Introduction. 8th edn. Harlow: Pearson Education Ltd.
- BPP. (2023). AAT Level 3 Course Book: Diploma in Accounting Q2022. Management Accounting Techniques Coursebook. London: BPP Learning Media Ltd.
- McLaney, E. and Attrill, P. (2023). Accounting and Finance. An Introduction. 10th edn. Harlow: Pearson Education Ltd.
Format of your submission and how your assignment will be assessed
- Your assignment must be saved in Microsoft Word Format and uploaded on Moodle in only this format.
- Your file must also contain at least 20 words of text, consist of fewer than 400 pages, and be less than 40MB in size.
Buy Answer of This Assessment & Raise Your Grades
Marking Scheme / Rubric –
The Marking Scheme (otherwise known as a rubric) is available on the Assignment Information Tab on Moodle.
Submission Requirements
Submission Platform This assignment should be submitted electronically using Moodle to the Module Submission link
Submission Date &Time All submission & resubmission dates and time are as stated at the beginning of this Assignment brief.
You should submit your Assignment for all deadlines earlier than 2:00pm on the date stated.
Late submissions can be accepted for Summative Submissions only up to a maximum of 2 working days after the submission deadline. This does not apply to resubmission deadlines. A 10 mark deduction will be made by CCCU for all late submissions.
Work submitted more than two working days after the deadline will not be accepted and will be recorded as a non-submission.
Assignments submitted to the Resubmissions deadlines will be capped at 40 by CCCU.
If you are affected by events which are unexpected, outside your control and short-term in nature (i.e. lasting one to two weeks), under the exceptional circumstances procedure you may be eligible for:
- A seven day extension to your coursework (via self-certification request).
- A 14 day extension to your coursework (via evidence-based request).
- To defer your exam or time-constrained assessment if you have not yet submitted/attempted it (via self-certification or evidence-based request).
- To re-take an exam/time-constrained assessment, if you feel your performance on your first attempt was negatively impacted (via impaired performance request).
Please note students are only eligible to have a maximum of 2 self-certification requests per academic year.
You can make a self-certification request up to 14 calendar days before your deadline:
- for coursework it must be no later than 2pm on the deadline date
- for exams and time-constrained assessments, the request must be submitted no later than the start time of the assessment.
Are You Looking for Answer of This Assignment or Essay
Table of Penalties
Issue with the Assignment | Penalty to be Applied |
---|---|
Suspected Academic Misconduct or Breach of Academic integrity | The Assignment will be graded zero. Written feedback will be ‘This assignment has been identified as potential Academic Misconduct/Breach of Academic Integrity. You will be invited to a meeting to discuss’. You will be invited to a meeting with an academic Misconduct reviewer. When you attend the meeting if Academic Misconduct or the breach of Academic Integrity is upheld you will be asked to rewrite the section of the assignment it applies to and re-submit the assignment. Do not upload any assignments to the AMC submission links before the meeting otherwise it will be removed. Failure to attend the meeting means the assignment will remain graded at zero and you will be unable to pass the module until you have attended the meeting. |
The assignment is more than 10% over the prescribed wordcount i.e. for 3,000 words, if 3,400 is submitted excluding the cover page, table of contents, references and appendices. | A 10-mark deduction applied to the overall grade that is manually entered by the Lecturer. This deduction is capped at 40%, which means an assignment cannot get less than 40% if a deduction has to be made. For example, if the mark for the assignment was 60. The lecturer would deduct 10 marks and the mark will be 50. Written feedback will also state ‘This assignment is 10% over the wordcount and 10 marks have been deducted’. |
Where assignments are more than 10% less than the prescribed wordcount and lecturers cannot identify if the learning outcomes have been met. | This assignment will be graded below 40. |
Where a student submits a .pdf instead of a word document. | This assignment will be graded a Fail. The lecturer will grade as 1 and the written feedback will state ‘This is a pdf submission and is not allowed. All submissions should be in Microsoft Word format’. |
Students not working in their groups as agreed by the lecturer. | This assignment will be graded a Fail. The lecturer will grade as 1 and the written feedback will state ‘This submission was not completed in the designated group’. Please note: Where a student has asked the lecturer to move from their original group and the lecturer has agreed this does not apply. |
For a presentation assignment that requires oral delivery, and the student does not present in person. | The Oral rubric criteria is not moved, and the oral criteria will remain at zero. |
For a presentation assignment and the student does not upload a converted PPT To Word File with speaker notes. | The communication rubric criteria is not moved, and the communication criteria will remain at zero. |
For a presentation assignment that requires oral delivery, and the student did not present on the day or upload the presentation to a Word document with speaker Notes. | This assignment will be graded a Fail. The lecturer will grade as 1 and the written feedback will state ‘There was no Oral presentation in class and the submission was not converted to Microsoft Word’. |
For a presentation assignment the student uploads a file that contains no slides and is simply continuous text. | This assignment will be graded a Fail. The lecturer will grade as 1 and the written feedback will state ‘There are no slides present in the assignment submission’. |
If the assignment is group work and the resubmission is not changed to individual work. If a group assignment is failed then the resubmitted work must be changed by a minimum of 25% to make it an individual piece of work. This means if a Group Presentation is 12 slides a minimum of 3 must be different to the group submission. If the assignment is a Group Poster with 6 text boxes then a minimum of 2 of them must be different to the Group Poster. | This assignment will be graded a Fail. The lecturer will grade as 1 and the written feedback will state ‘This resubmission should be individual and a minimum of 25% of the assignment has not changed’. |
Where a written assignment has text that is unable to be read by Turnitin because it is either a graphical image (excluding Presentations & Posters); for example, a screenshot or the assignment is written within text boxes on each page. | This assignment will be graded 0 and the written feedback should state ‘This assignment is unreadable by Turnitin and cannot be checked for Academic Misconduct. It has been referred for an AMC meeting’. The assignment will then be referred for Academic Misconduct investigation. |
An assignment that does not make use of any Mandatory references provided in the assignment brief/Module Handbook. | The reference rubric criteria is not moved and that criteria will remain at zero |
An assignment has a reference list, but no citations. | The reference rubric criteria is not moved and that criteria will remain at zero. Written feedback should state ‘The reference criteria has been graded Zero as no citations have been used. Please include citations in your assignment to support the academic points being made’. |
An assignment has no citations and no reference list. | Foundation & Level 4 – The reference rubric criteria is not moved and that criteria will remain at zero. The written feedback will state ‘Please ensure that you use citations and references to support your assignment submission’. At Level 5 and Level 6 this would be graded as a Fail. The lecturer will grade as 1 and written feedback will also show ‘This assignment has no citations and no reference list’. |
Where False references are included in an assignment. | This will be referred for Academic Misconduct. This assignment will be graded 0 and the written feedback should state ‘This assignment contains false references and has been referred for Academic Misconduct. You will be invited to attend an Academic Misconduct meeting’. |
Assignment is submitted after the Late Deadline or if it is a Resubmission, after the Resubmission deadline | This assignment will be graded a Fail. The lecturer will grade as 1 and written feedback should state ‘This assignment was submitted after the deadline. Please resubmit at the next resubmission opportunity.’ |
Student Integrity and Academic Misconduct
The values of student integrity expected by CCCU are:
- Honesty – being clear about what is your work and where your ideas come from other sources.
- Trust – others can have faith in you being open about your work and acknowledging others’ work.
- Fairness – you do not try to gain an unfair advantage in using others’ work.
- Responsibility – you take an active role in applying the principle of Academic Integrity to your work.
- Respect – you show respect for the work of others.
Peer-support:
Students might choose to get support from their peers when preparing assessments, such as discussing the subject of the assessment, exchanging ideas, and receiving suggestions for improving the work. This is peer-support, and the University accepts this as a reasonable expectation when completing assessments. However, peers must not make any changes to anyone’s assessments as such actions could lead to allegations of academic misconduct.
Use of English as the medium of assessment:
Students cannot write an assessment in another language and subsequently translate their work into English or have it translated by any form of third-party. Use of translation software or third-party translators is a form of academic misconduct.
Artificial Intelligence (AI):
Students must write the entire assessment without using AI software such as ChatGPT. Submitting an assessment that contains any form of AI is a form of academic misconduct.
Proofreading:
Students can make use of Microsoft Word’s grammar and spell-checking functions but the use of Grammarly is not allowed as it uses AI text generation. If student’s use third-party proofreaders, these cannot make any changes that alter the assessment in anyway including correcting language or citation format errors. Third-party alterations to the assessment are a form of academic misconduct.
Plagiarism
Plagiarism can be defined as incorporating another person’s material from books, journals, the internet, another student’s work, or any other source into assessment material without acknowledgement. It includes:
- Using exactly the same words (sentences, phrases or even expressions not in everyday use, invented or created by an author to explain an idea) as used originally
- Rephrasing by making slight adjustments
- Paraphrasing in a way which may deceive the reader as to the source.
- Plagiarism in whatever form it takes is form of academic misconduct.
Do You Need Assignment of This Question
Collusion:
If students submit work for assessment that is falsely presented as the student’s own work but was jointly written with somebody else; this is a form of academic misconduct.
Duplication/Self-Plagiarism:
The inclusion in assessments of a significant amount of identical or substantially similar material to that already submitted for assessment by the student and graded for the same course or any other course or module at this University or elsewhere is classed as self-plagiarism. It does not include a resubmission of the same piece of work allowed by the examiners in an improved or revised form for reassessment purposes. Self-plagiarism is a form of academic misconduct.
Further clarification of the above can be found in CCCU’s Academic Misconduct documents below
- CCCU Student Academic Misconduct Procedures can found below: Please click the link to Open.
https://www.canterbury.ac.uk/asset-library/policy-zone/Student-Academic-Misconduct-Procedures-staff-students.pdf - CCCU Student Academic Integrity Policy can be found below: Please click the link to Open.
https://www.canterbury.ac.uk/asset-library/policy-zone/Student-Academic-Integrity-Policy.pdf
Prepare your Management Accounting Assignment Report for BioTube Ltd. Case Study with the help of UK Assignment Helper. There are specialized professionals for all categories of assignments who offer you plagiarism-free and superior content. You are assured that our report-writing service will make you productive and help you achieve high grades in your academic year. A free list of assignment samples written by PhD experts is also provided here that can help you boost your study power and check the quality of the report. So contact us today and get your top-notch report!
