How to Write the EBB_6_060 Contract Administration Report
Quick answer: To write the EBB_6_060 contract administration report, give each of the five chapters its own 1,000-word plan, tie every digital tool to a specific administrator task and a contract clause, and collect at least ten mixed sources per chapter. Markers reward critical comparison of NEC4 and JCT, not lists of technologies.
You are one of five new starters in a contractor’s Contracts, Tendering and Disputes department, and the group has 5,000 words to explain how digital technologies improve contract administration. The brief is long, the chapters are unequal in difficulty, and nobody has agreed who owns Chapter 5. This guide sets out how to write the EBB_6_060 contract administration report at LSBU so the team does not lose marks on structure before it reaches the content. You can read the EBB_6_060 group coursework brief alongside this post, and a model-answer extract for reference only shows the style.
What does the EBB_6_060 report actually ask for?
The report has five chapters of about 1,000 words, each marked out of 8, and 10 further marks for presentation. Those 10 marks split into four parts of 2.5: an executive summary, contents and structure, Harvard referencing, and a reference list with at least ten sources per chapter that mixes academic, legal and technical material. Turnitin similarity is capped at 15%. No conclusion chapter is required, which tempts teams to stop at Chapter 5 and leave the report without a close. Put the key findings in the executive summary instead.
The scenario matters more than students expect. You write as junior staff advising a contractor, so every chapter should answer a practical question: what should our department do differently on a retrofit project? A chapter that describes drones without saying what a contract administrator does with the footage reads as a technology essay, and the marker will say so.
How should you plan each chapter?
Chapter by chapter, here is the plan most teams find workable. Treat the third column as the marker’s test.
| Chapter | Core argument to build | What the marker looks for |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Role in retrofit | The administrator’s duties have widened through the Golden Thread and the Building Safety Act 2022 | A clear NEC4 versus JCT Standard Building Contract comparison, applied to retrofit |
| 2. Monitoring tools | Drones, digital twins and sensors support certification but raise data and liability issues | Link from tool to task to clause; real treatment of privacy |
| 3. Avoiding disputes | Early warning, partnering and AI risk flags reduce disputes if they are written into the contract | NEC4 early warning, PPC2000 and FAC-1 compared, not merely described |
| 4. JCT beyond paper | E-tendering and platforms improve transparency but create IP and confidentiality questions | Two ADR methods discussed; tailoring for a small retrofit |
| 5. Blockchain | Useful for narrow, repeatable transactions; hype for the rest | Evidence, not enthusiasm; examples clearly labelled as real or hypothetical |
How do you compare NEC4 and JCT without writing a list of features?
Pick three retrofit-specific tests and run both forms through them. Good tests are unknown existing conditions, communication duties, and how each form carries an information requirement such as a Golden Thread record. NEC4 has a mandatory early-warning mechanism, which the publisher itself calls the jewel in the crown of NEC contracts (NEC, n.d.). The JCT Standard Building Contract is more familiar in building work and relies on a certifying administrator. Say which you would prefer for a small occupied-building retrofit and give two reasons.
A common slip is describing the Golden Thread as if it applied to every building. The Building Safety Act 2022 applies its strongest duties to higher-risk buildings, and the Hackitt review that preceded it focused on high-rise residential safety (Hackitt, 2018). A retrofit team that says “this applies only to higher-risk buildings, but good practice extends it” shows accuracy and judgement together. That is the kind of sentence markers underline.
How do you handle data, privacy and liability in Chapter 2?
Sensors that track worker movement or productivity create personal data. The Data Protection Act 2018 and UK GDPR apply, and the Information Commissioner’s Office publishes guidance on monitoring workers (ICO, 2026). Standard forms say little on this, so the strongest answers propose the contract solution: a data schedule covering purpose, controller, retention and restrictions on secondary use.
Do not ignore payment law either. Under the Housing Grants, Construction and Regeneration Act 1996, notices must still be issued on time whatever the data says. Digital evidence helps you justify a valuation, but it does not move the deadline. If your team makes that point, you will have connected technology to the real working life of an administrator.
Is blockchain hype or hope, and how do you argue it?
Argue it with a test. Hunhevicz and Hall (2020) offer a decision framework asking whether a project needs a shared ledger at all, and Li, Greenwood and Kassem (2019) reviewed construction use cases that were largely conceptual or pilot-stage. On the legal side, the Law Commission (2021) advised that the law of England and Wales can already support smart legal contracts. Your chapter can then say: legally possible, practically narrow.
If the brief asks for real public works examples and you cannot find a verified one, do not invent one. Write a hypothetical scenario and mark every number “illustrative”. Markers treat a clearly labelled hypothetical far better than a vague claim that “some councils have trialled this”.
What do markers want on the 10 presentation marks?
Those marks are the easiest in the report to win and the easiest to lose, because they depend on the team and not on any one writer.
- Executive summary: one page, written last, with the five chapter findings in two sentences each.
- Contents and structure: numbered headings, consistent levels, and page numbers that match.
- Harvard: one format for statutes, reports and journal articles, agreed before writing starts.
- Reference list: count sources per chapter in a shared sheet and make sure each chapter shows an academic, a legal and a technical source.
Checklist to maximise marks
- Write one sentence per chapter that states your argument before drafting.
- Use one comparison table per chapter, then comment on it in prose.
- Cite statutes by short title and chapter, and reports by author and year.
- Keep quotations short; Turnitin counts them against the 15% cap.
- Give each chapter a named owner and an editor from a different pair.
- Run a joint read-through to remove overlap between Chapters 2 and 4, where digital platforms appear in both.
- Check the word count per chapter, since five unequal chapters make the total look right while one section is thin.
Common mistakes in group contract administration reports
Teams usually fail in predictable places. The first is a technology tour: five paragraphs on what drones are, none on certification. The second is uneven voice, where Chapter 3 sounds like a legal memo and Chapter 5 like a blog. The third is weak sources. Trade-press articles are useful, but a chapter that cites nothing from a statute, a regulator or a journal will struggle on the reference-list criterion.
A fourth mistake is quieter. Students describe NEC4 and JCT separately and never compare them. In moderation, markers tend to look for the comparative sentence, because it is the clearest evidence of critical analysis. Another point: do not overstate what standard forms say about digital data. If you are unsure whether a clause exists, check the form itself or say the form is silent.
FAQs
How many words should each chapter be?
About 1,000 words each, for a 5,000-word report. The brief gives each chapter 8 marks, so an unbalanced report loses marks somewhere. Treat 900 to 1,100 as a sensible working range and agree it before drafting.
Do we need a conclusion?
The brief does not ask for one, so you are not required to add it. Use the executive summary to state your overall findings, and keep every chapter’s final paragraph pointed at a recommendation for the department.
What counts as a legal source?
Statutes, regulations and recognised legal guidance count, for example the Building Safety Act 2022 or the Housing Grants, Construction and Regeneration Act 1996. Standard-form contracts are technical or contractual documents, so cite them in addition, not instead.
How do we keep Turnitin similarity under 15%?
Paraphrase, quote sparingly, and avoid pasting from contract clauses or the brief. Check the draft in the submission tool if your university allows a draft check, and remember reference lists can add to the figure.
Can we use AI tools to find risks, as Chapter 3 discusses?
Chapter 3 asks about AI tools in contract workflows as a topic. Whether you may use AI to help write your own report depends on LSBU’s assessment rules, so confirm that with your module leader and cite anything you are allowed to use.
What if our team cannot find a real UK blockchain example?
Say so. Build a short hypothetical scenario, label every figure illustrative, and explain what evidence would be needed to test it. That is honest and still earns analysis marks.
Writing a five-part report alongside four teammates is hard to coordinate. If your team wants structure or a model to compare against, our construction assignment help offers guidance and model answers, and you remain responsible for your own submission. You can also check the refund and revision policy before you decide, and our report writing support covers longer team documents. Start the executive summary last, and start the reference sheet today.
About the expert
Guidance on this topic reflects the profile of Eleanor Lawrence, whose listing shows a BTech in Civil Engineering from the University of Oxford, subject areas including Construction Management, and eight years as an expert assignment helper alongside work as a civil engineer at a UK-based firm.
References
- Building Safety Act 2022, c. 30. Available at: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2022/30/contents (Accessed: 28 October 2026).
- Data Protection Act 2018, c. 12. Available at: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2018/12/contents (Accessed: 28 October 2026).
- Hackitt, J. (2018) Independent Review of Building Regulations and Fire Safety: final report. London: Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/independent-review-of-building-regulations-and-fire-safety-final-report (Accessed: 28 October 2026).
- Housing Grants, Construction and Regeneration Act 1996, c. 53. Available at: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1996/53/contents (Accessed: 28 October 2026).
- Hunhevicz, J.J. and Hall, D.M. (2020) ‘Do you need a blockchain in construction? Use case categories and decision framework for DLT design options’, Advanced Engineering Informatics, 45, article 101094. doi:10.1016/j.aei.2020.101094.
- Information Commissioner’s Office (2026) Employment practices and data protection: monitoring workers. Available at: https://ico.org.uk/for-organisations/uk-gdpr-guidance-and-resources/employment/monitoring-workers/ (Accessed: 28 October 2026).
- Law Commission (2021) Smart legal contracts: advice to government. Available at: https://lawcom.gov.uk/project/smart-contracts/ (Accessed: 28 October 2026).
- Li, J., Greenwood, D. and Kassem, M. (2019) ‘Blockchain in the built environment and construction industry: a systematic review, conceptual models and practical use cases’, Automation in Construction, 102, pp. 288-307. doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2019.02.005.
- NEC (n.d.) Seven practical tips for making NEC early warnings more effective. Available at: https://neccontract.com/news/seven-practical-tips-for-making-nec-early-warnings-more-effective (Accessed: 28 October 2026).
