EFIMM0029 Fundamentals of Corporate Finance UOB Assignment Answer UK

EFIMM0029 Fundamentals of Corporate Finance course delves into the essential principles and concepts that underpin the financial operations of companies. Whether you are a business student, an aspiring financial analyst, or a professional looking to enhance your understanding of corporate finance, this course will provide you with a solid foundation.

Corporate finance is a vital discipline that encompasses the management of a company’s financial resources, investment decisions, and capital structure. It plays a crucial role in the success and growth of organizations, as it enables them to make informed financial choices that drive profitability, maximize shareholder value, and create sustainable competitive advantages.

Buy Non Plagiarized & Properly Structured Assignment Solution

Acquire cheap assignment help for EFIMM0029 Fundamentals of Corporate Finance course!

Students Assignment Help UK provides affordable and reliable assignment assistance for the EFIMM0029 Fundamentals of Corporate Finance course. Their team of experienced and qualified writers understands the intricacies of corporate finance and can help students with various aspects of the subject. With their commitment to delivering high-quality work within the given deadline, students can acquire cheap assignment help without compromising on the quality of their assignments.

In this section, we will provide some assignment objectives. These are:

Assignment Objective 1: Describe, apply and evaluate the techniques that firms use in investment appraisal.

Investment appraisal is a crucial process for firms to assess the feasibility and potential returns of investment projects. Various techniques are employed to evaluate the viability and profitability of these projects. Here, I will describe, apply, and evaluate some commonly used techniques in investment appraisal.

Net Present Value (NPV): NPV calculates the present value of all cash flows associated with an investment by discounting them at an appropriate rate. The formula for NPV is: NPV = Sum of [CFt / (1+r)^t] – Initial Investment

Application: Estimate the cash inflows and outflows over the project’s lifespan, determine the appropriate discount rate (considering risk and opportunity cost of capital), and calculate the NPV. If NPV is positive, the project is considered financially viable.

Evaluation: NPV considers the time value of money and provides a measure of profitability. It accounts for the project’s cash flows, but it relies on accurate cash flow estimations and assumes reinvestment of cash inflows at the discount rate.

Internal Rate of Return (IRR): IRR is the discount rate that equates the present value of cash inflows with the present value of cash outflows. It represents the project’s rate of return. The formula for IRR involves solving for the rate that makes NPV equal to zero.

Application: Determine the cash flows, calculate the IRR, and compare it with the firm’s required rate of return. If the IRR is higher than the required rate, the project is considered acceptable.

Evaluation: IRR considers the time value of money and provides a percentage return. It is useful for comparing projects and determining the maximum rate at which the project can be funded. However, IRR assumes reinvestment at the IRR itself, which may not be realistic.

Payback Period: The payback period is the time required to recover the initial investment from the cash inflows. It provides an indication of how quickly the investment will generate returns.

Application: Identify the project’s cash inflows and determine the time it takes for cumulative cash inflows to equal or exceed the initial investment. Compare the payback period with the firm’s acceptable threshold.

Evaluation: Payback period provides a simple measure of liquidity and risk, focusing on the speed of cash recovery. However, it ignores cash flows beyond the payback period and doesn’t consider the time value of money.

Accounting Rate of Return (ARR): ARR evaluates the profitability of an investment by comparing the average accounting profit to the initial investment.

Application: Determine the average annual accounting profit over the investment’s lifespan and divide it by the initial investment. Compare the ARR with a predetermined target rate or the firm’s required rate of return.

Evaluation: ARR is easy to calculate and understand, as it relies on accounting data. However, it doesn’t consider the time value of money, ignores cash flows, and relies on accounting profit, which may not reflect economic reality.

Profitability Index (PI): PI measures the value created per unit of investment by comparing the present value of cash inflows to the initial investment.

Application: Calculate the present value of cash inflows and divide it by the initial investment. If PI is greater than 1, the project is considered economically viable.

Evaluation: PI accounts for the time value of money and provides a ratio indicating the value created per unit invested. However, it may favor larger projects, as it doesn’t consider the project’s scale.

These techniques provide different perspectives on investment appraisal, considering factors like time value of money, profitability, liquidity, and risk. It is important for firms to carefully evaluate and consider multiple techniques to make informed investment decisions.

Please Write Fresh Non Plagiarized Assignment on this Topic

Assignment Objective 2: Derive and understand the core theories surrounding firms’ capital structure policies.

The capital structure of a firm refers to the way it finances its operations by utilizing a combination of debt and equity. The core theories surrounding firms’ capital structure policies attempt to explain how firms determine the optimal mix of debt and equity to maximize their value and minimize their cost of capital. Two prominent theories in this area are the Modigliani-Miller (MM) theorem and the trade-off theory.

  1. Modigliani-Miller (MM) Theorem: The MM theorem, developed by Franco Modigliani and Merton Miller in the 1950s and 1960s, provides insights into the relationship between a firm’s capital structure and its value. It is based on the following assumptions:
  1. Perfect capital markets: The MM theorem assumes the absence of taxes, transaction costs, bankruptcy costs, and asymmetric information.
  2. Homogeneous expectations: Investors have the same expectations about the firm’s future cash flows.
  3. No agency costs: There are no conflicts of interest between management and shareholders.

According to the MM theorem, in a perfect capital market, the capital structure of a firm is irrelevant to its value. This means that the value of a firm is determined solely by its underlying business operations and not by the way it chooses to finance those operations. The theorem suggests that investors can create their desired capital structure by combining debt and equity in the market. In other words, the cost of capital and the firm’s value remain constant regardless of the capital structure.

  1. Trade-off Theory: The trade-off theory recognizes that in the real world, markets are not perfect and various costs and imperfections exist. This theory suggests that firms have a target capital structure that balances the benefits and costs associated with debt and equity financing. Key considerations include:
  1. Tax advantage of debt: Interest payments on debt are tax-deductible, providing a tax shield that reduces the firm’s tax liability and increases its cash flows.
  2. Financial distress costs: Taking on too much debt increases the risk of financial distress, potentially leading to bankruptcy. Financial distress costs include bankruptcy costs, legal fees, and the loss of business reputation.
  3. Agency costs: Higher levels of debt can create agency conflicts between shareholders and debtholders. Shareholders may take excessive risks to benefit themselves at the expense of debtholders.

The trade-off theory suggests that firms determine their optimal capital structure by balancing the tax advantage of debt against the costs of financial distress and agency conflicts. Firms tend to increase their debt levels until the marginal benefit of the tax shield is offset by the marginal cost of financial distress and agency costs.

It’s important to note that while the MM theorem and the trade-off theory provide valuable insights, the real world is more complex, and other factors, such as industry characteristics, market conditions, and managerial preferences, also influence capital structure decisions. Empirical research continues to explore these theories and refine our understanding of firms’ capital structure policies.

Assignment Objective 3: Derive and understand the key theories of dividend policies.

Dividend policy refers to the set of principles and guidelines that a company follows when deciding how much of its earnings to distribute to shareholders as dividends. Several theories have been proposed to explain and guide dividend policy decisions. Let’s explore some of the key theories:

  1. Modigliani-Miller (M&M) Irrelevance Theory: The M&M theory, proposed by Franco Modigliani and Merton Miller in 1961, states that under perfect capital markets, dividend policy is irrelevant to the value of a firm. According to this theory, the value of a company is determined solely by its investment opportunities and the risk of its underlying assets. In other words, whether a firm pays dividends or retains earnings, the total value of the firm remains the same. Investors can create their own dividends by selling shares if needed.
  2. Bird-in-the-Hand Theory: The bird-in-the-hand theory, put forth by Myron Gordon and John Lintner, suggests that investors prefer to receive dividends in the present rather than uncertain future capital gains. The theory argues that paying dividends provides shareholders with a tangible return and reduces uncertainty. Therefore, according to this theory, firms with higher dividend payouts should have higher stock prices and vice versa.
  3. Tax Preference Theory: The tax preference theory considers the impact of taxes on dividend policy decisions. It argues that investors prefer capital gains over dividends due to the potential tax advantages. In many jurisdictions, capital gains are taxed at a lower rate than dividends. Thus, companies may opt for retaining earnings and reinvesting in the business rather than paying dividends to mitigate the tax burden on shareholders.
  4. Signaling Theory: The signaling theory, proposed by Bhattacharya in 1979, suggests that dividend policy serves as a signal to investors about the firm’s financial health and future prospects. According to this theory, an increase in dividends is viewed positively by investors, indicating that the company is confident in its profitability and has sufficient cash flow to distribute. Conversely, a decrease in dividends or not paying dividends at all may signal financial difficulties or a lack of investment opportunities.
  5. Agency Cost Theory: The agency cost theory focuses on the relationship between shareholders and management. It suggests that dividend policy can help align the interests of shareholders and managers by reducing agency costs. Paying dividends forces managers to distribute cash to shareholders, limiting their ability to misuse funds for personal gain or inefficient investments. Thus, a higher dividend payout ratio may reduce agency costs and increase managerial accountability.
  6. Residual Theory: The residual theory of dividends, introduced by Walter in 1956, proposes that a firm should first finance all acceptable investment opportunities and then distribute the remaining earnings as dividends. According to this theory, dividends are paid from residual earnings, i.e., what is left after funding all positive net present value (NPV) projects. The goal is to maximize the firm’s value by investing in projects that generate returns higher than the cost of capital.

It’s important to note that these theories provide different perspectives on dividend policy and may have varying degrees of relevance depending on the specific circumstances of a company. Actual dividend policy decisions often consider a combination of these theories, along with factors such as industry norms, cash flow requirements, and the firm’s growth prospects.

Pay & Get Instant Solution of this Assignment of Essay by UK Writers

Choose Affordable Assignment Assistance for EFIMM0029 Fundamentals of Corporate Finance Provided by UK Experts!

At Students Assignment Help UK, we are committed to providing high-quality academic assistance across a range of subjects and disciplines. The assignment sample mentioned earlier is based on EFIMM0029 Fundamentals of Corporate Finance, showcasing the expertise of our Finance assignment experts. However, our services extend beyond finance to cater to the diverse needs of students.

If you require assistance with report writing in UK, our team of professional writers is well-equipped to help you. Whether it’s a business report, research report, or any other type of report, our experts have the knowledge and experience to deliver well-structured and informative reports tailored to your specific requirements. Moreover, if you need essay writing services in the UK, we have a dedicated team of essay writers UK who can assist you in crafting outstanding essays.

To avail of our services, all you need to do is pay for college assignments. Our pricing is competitive and affordable, considering the level of expertise and quality we provide. We value your trust and strive to maintain a high level of customer satisfaction.

do you want plagiarism free & researched assignment solution!


Get Your Assignment Completed At Lower Prices

Plagiarism Free Solutions
100% Original Work
24*7 Online Assistance
Native PhD Experts
Hire a Writer Now