- Proqual Level 6 NVQ Diploma in Occupational Health and Safety Practice Assignment: Analyzing and Promoting a Positive Health and Safety Culture within Organisations
- Health and Social Care Assignment: Understanding Roles, Responsibilities, and Quality Care Delivery
- Level 5 in Leadership and Management in Adult Care Assignment: Effective Supervision, Coaching, and Mentoring of Practitioners to Enhance Quality Care
- Level 5 in Leadership and Management in Adult Care Assignment : A Comprehensive Study of Leadership Styles, Theories, and Skills
- CIPD Level 7OS06 Well-Being at Work Assignment: Examining Organisational Responsibilities, Impacts, and Strategic Interventions to Enhance Employee Wellbeing
- LIN 819 Linguistics Assignment: Exploring Critical Thinking, Paraphrasing Techniques, and SWOT Analysis for Academic Excellence
- Financial Mathematics and Investment Valuation Assignment: Practical Concepts of Loans, Bonds, Interest Rates, Returns, Convexity, and Equity Valuation
- Level 5 Certificate in Aesthetic Practice Assignment 2 : A Comparative Analysis of Healthcare and Non-Healthcare Professionals With Guidelines
- Pearson BTEC Level 5 Higher National Diploma in Engineering : Unit 4019 Electrical and Electronic Principles Assignment Final Report with Practical Labs, Circuit Analysis & Simulations
- Business Data Analytics and Decision Making TMA-02 : A Consulting Approach for Maria’s Eco-Friendly Product Line
- CIPD Level 7 Strategic Management Assignment Question 2 : Impact of Globalisation, Tech, Ageing & Economy
- CIPD Level 7LD02 Leadership & Management Development Assignment: CIPD Case Study for CPD Planning
- B00807007 Retail Theory Evaluation Assignment 1: Cyclical, Non‑Cyclical Models & Modern Retail Strategies
- OTHM Level 5 (D/650/1140) Health Education and Promoting Wellbeing Assignment: Approaches, Behaviour Change & Campaign Strategies
- Unit 3 SEM201HSC (D/615/3823) Health and Social Care Assignment : Roles, Regulations & Interprofessional Teamwork Case Study for Quality Care Delivery
- CMI 508 Assignment: Developing a Skilled and Talented Workforce for Organisational Success
- Level 5 Unit 10 Partnership Working Assignment: Adult Care Case Study on Integrated Practice, Legislation & Collaborative Relationships
- Level 5 Effective Communication, Information Handling & Complaints Management Assignment: Health and Social Care Case Study
- Business Introduction Assignment: Ownership & Stakeholder Engagement in Two Organisations
- OTHM Level 5 Unit H/650/1142 Professional Supervision Assignment: Health & Social Care Case for Managing Supervision and Performance
evaluate the impact of a care bundle (antenatal information to women, manual perineal protection and mediolateral episiotomy when indicated) on obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI) rates: Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research Paper, QEUH, UK
| University | Queen Elizabeth University Hospital |
| Subject | Obstetrics and Gynaecology |
Objective
To evaluate the impact of a care bundle (antenatal information to women, manual perineal protection, and mediolateral episiotomy when indicated) on obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI) rates.
Design
Multicentre stepped-wedge cluster design.
Setting Sixteen maternity units located in four regions across England, Scotland, and Wales.
Do You Need Assignment of This Question
Population
Women with singleton live births between October 2016 and March 2018.
Methods
Stepwise region by region roll-out every 3 months starting January 2017. The four maternity units in a region started at the same time. Multi-level logistic regression was used to estimate the impact of the care bundle, adjusting for time trend and case-mix factors (age, ethnicity, body mass index, parity, birth weight, and mode of birth).
main outcome measures
Obstetric anal sphincter injury in singleton live vaginal births.
Results
A total of 55 060 singleton live vaginal births were included (79% spontaneous and 21% operative). The median maternal age was 30 years (interquartile range 26–34 years) and 46% of women were primiparous. The OASI rate decreased from 3.3% before to 3.0% aftercare bundle implementation (adjusted odds ratio 0.80, 95% CI 0.65–0.98, P = 0.03). There was no evidence that the effect of the care bundle differed
according to parity (P = 0.77) or mode of birth (P = 0.31). There were no significant changes in cesarean section(P = 0.19) or episiotomy rates (P = 0.16) during the study period.
Conclusions
The implementation of this care bundle reduced OASI rates without affecting cesarean section rates of episiotomy use. These findings demonstrate its potential for reducing perineal trauma during childbirth.
Keywords
Obstetric anal sphincter injury, perineal tear, quality improvement.
Tweetable abstract
OASI Care Bundle reduced severe perineal tear rates without affecting cesarean section rates of episiotomy use.
Buy Answer of This Assessment & Raise Your Grades
Students Assignment Help UK offers the top-rated research paper help on Obstetrics and Gynaecology. Our skilled writers have a deep understanding to create 100% plagiarism-free solutions on CIPD assignments at an affordable price.
Answer
